Abstract

Context.The production of neutron-rich elements at neutron densities intermediate to those of thes- andr-processes, the so-calledi-process, has been identified as possibly being responsible for the observed abundance pattern found in certain carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars. The production site may be low-metallicity stars on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) where the physical processes during the thermal pulses are not well known.Aims.We investigate the impact of overshoot from various convective boundaries during the AGB phase on proton ingestion events (PIEs) and the neutron densities as a necessary precondition for thei-process as well as on the structure and continued evolution of the models.Methods.We therefore analyzed models of a 1.2 M⊙,Z = 5 × 10−5star. A fiducial model without overshoot on the AGB (overshoot was applied during the pre-AGB evolution) serves as a reference. The same model was then run with various overshoot values and the resulting models were compared to one another. Light element nucleosynthesis is also discussed. Additionally, we introduce a new timescale argument to predict PIE occurrence to discriminate between a physical and a numerical reason for a nonoccurrence. A comparison to observations as well as previous studies was conducted before finally presenting the most promising choice of overshoot parameters for the occurrence of thei-process in low-mass, low-metallicity models.Results.The fiducial model reveals high neutron densities and a persistent split of the pulse-driven convection zone (PDCZ). Overshoot from the PDCZ results in either temporary or permanent remerging of the split PDCZ, influencing the star’s structure and evolution. While both overshoot and non-overshoot models exhibit PIEs generating neutron densities suitable for thei-process, they lead to varied C/O and N/O ratios and notable Li enhancements. Comparison with previous studies and observations of CEMP-r/s stars suggests that while surface enhancements in our models may be exaggerated, abundance ratios align well. Though, for high values of overshoot from the PDCZ the agreement becomes worse.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.