Abstract

Extensive studies on the taxonomic resolution required for bioassessment purposes have determined that resolution above species level (genus, family) is sufficient for their use as indicators of relevant environmental pressures. The high‐throughput sequencing (HTS) and meta‐barcoding methods now used for bioassessment traditionally employ an arbitrary sequence similarity threshold (SST) around 95% or 97% to cluster sequences into operational taxonomic units, which is considered descriptive of species‐level resolution. In this study, we analyzed the effect of the SST on the resulting diatom‐based ecological quality index, which is based on OTU abundance distribution along a defined environmental gradient, ideally avoiding taxonomic assignments that could result in high rates of unclassified OTUs and biased final values. A total of 90 biofilm samples were collected in 2014 and 2015 from 51 stream sites on Mayotte Island in parallel with measures of relevant physical and chemical parameters. HTS sequencing was performed on the biofilms using the rbcL region as the genetic marker and diatom‐specific primers. Hierarchical clustering was used to group sequences into OTUs using 20 experimental SST levels (80%–99%). An OTU‐based quality index (IdxOTU) was developed based on a weighted average equation using the abundance profiles of the OTUs. The developed IdxOTU revealed significant correlations between the IdxOTU values and the reference pressure gradient, which reached maximal performance using an SST of 90% (well above species level delimitation). We observed an interesting and important trade‐off with the power to discriminate between sampling sites and index stability that will greatly inform future applications of the index. Taken together, the results from this study detail a thoroughly optimized and validated approach to generating robust, reproducible, and complete indexes that will greatly facilitate effective and efficient environmental monitoring.

Highlights

  • Benthic diatoms are widely used as ecological indicators for bodies of water due to their short generation time, large diversity, high and sensitivity to environmental changes (Mann & Vanormelingen, 2013)

  • We investigate the impact of the sequence similarity threshold (SST) on the operational taxonomic units (OTU) quality index (IdxOTU) using the abundance profiles of the different OTUs that result from a gradient of different SSTs (80%–99%)

  • We suggest that an optimal SST, analogous to the optimal taxonomic resolution in previous studies on microscopy‐based approaches (Rimet & Bouchez, 2012), can be identified that maximizes the index’s performance and stability

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Benthic diatoms are widely used as ecological indicators for bodies of water due to their short generation time, large diversity, high and sensitivity to environmental changes (Mann & Vanormelingen, 2013). While SST values can reach up to 99% (Apothéloz‐Perret‐Gentil et al, 2017), most range between 95% and 97% (Edgar, 2013; Elbrecht & Leese, 2015; Kelly et al, 2018; Patin et al, 2013), which is thought to effectively maximize genetic diversity while minimizing the frequency of sequencing errors in the resulting HTS‐ based dataset (Birtel, Walser, Pichon, Bürgmann, & Matthews, 2015; Schloss & Handelsman, 2005) These thresholds are treated as quasispecies level delimitations regardless of the specific marker, clustering method, or model organism used, even though these parameters can greatly affect the final OTU composition (Flynn et al, 2015). The effect of the SST on IdxOTU was analyzed from several aspects: (i) the number of OTUs defined at each SST, (ii) the proportion of OTUs identified at the species and genus level after taxonomic assignment (this aspect was studied but not included in the index development), (iii) the performance of the quality index using three different indicators: (iii‐a) the correlation between quality values and the reference environmental gradient, (iii‐b) the index’s capability to discriminate between sites with different quality values, and (iii‐c) the variability in the index values conferred by the process used for index development (stability)

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.