Abstract

The stock market might be impacted by natural disasters, which can cause significant market disruptions and financial uncertainty, as already shown in several existing studies. This study investigates the role of natural disasters in stock market movements in the US specifically, hypothesizing that incorporating natural disasters leads to more accurate stock market predictions. Various models, including Difference-in-Differences (DID), ARMA-GARCH/ARMAX-GARCH, and Random Forest, are employed to analyze the S&P 500 index's daily returns and the impact of natural disasters. The study reveals that the ARMA-GARCH model effectively captures market volatility but does not account for all influencing factors such as interest rate, inflation rate, and natural disasters. The DID method isolates natural disaster effects, showing significant but inconsistent impacts. The Random Forest model, incorporating a disaster severity index, yields more accurate predictions than the one without, reinforcing the hypothesis and supporting previous studies. Although the study highlights the importance of considering natural disasters in stock market predictions, it also underscores the market's complexity, indicating that more features and factors should be considered in future research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call