Abstract
Properly analyzing and reporting data remains a challenging task in epidemiologic research, as underreporting of data is often overlooked. The evaluation on the effect of underreporting remains understudied. In this study, we examined the effect of different scenarios of mortality underreporting on the relationship between PM10, temperature, and mortality. Mortality data, PM10, and temperature data in seven cities were obtained from Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System, and China National Environmental Monitoring Center, respectively. A time-series design with a distributed lag nonlinear model (DLNM) was used to examine the effects of five mortality underreporting scenarios: 1) Random underreporting of mortality; 2) Underreporting is monotonically increasing (MI) or monotonically decreasing (MD); 3) Underreporting due to holiday and weekends; 4) Underreporting occurs before the 20th day of each month, and these underreporting will be added after the 20th day of the month; and 5) Underreporting due to holiday, weekends, MI, and MD. We observed that underreporting at random (UAR) scenario had little effect on the association between PM10, temperature, and daily mortality. However, other four underreporting not at random (UNAR) scenarios mentioned above had varying degrees of influence on the association between PM10, temperature, and daily mortality. Additionally, in addition to imputation under UAR, the variation of minimum mortality temperature (MMT) and attributable fraction (AF) of mortality attributed to temperature in the same imputation scenarios is inconsistent in different cities. Finally, we observed that the pooled excess risk (ER) below MMT was negatively associated with mortality and the pooled ER above MMT was positively associated with mortality. This study showed that UNAR impacted the association between PM10, temperature, and mortality, and potential underreporting should be dealt with before analyzing data to avoid drawing invalid conclusions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.