Abstract

Affirmative action measures within the workplace seek to ensure equal employment opportunities and create a workforce that is representative of South African society. Accordingly, employers need to ensure that the substantive goal of equality is achieved when implementing affirmative action. One of the challenges faced by employers is the choice of beneficiary from designated groups which is diverse and unequal within itself. This paper seeks to address this challenge by looking at the definition given to beneficiaries of affirmative action and the concept of multi layered disadvantage within the Employment Equity Act. The paper will focus on the decision in Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security and National Commissioner of the South African Police Service which is an example of the disadvantages experienced by members of the designated groups who are also part of a minority group within the designated groups. Particular focus will be placed on the disadvantages experienced by a black female who is also part of a minority. This paper highlights the multi-layered nature of disadvantage experienced by such members of the designated groups and the need to ensure that new forms of disadvantage are not created in the implementation of affirmative action policies by using a situation sensitive approach. It argues that affirmative action as a means to an end needs to evolve with the understanding that it functions within an ever changing social and economic environment. If such changes are ignored the true beneficiaries of affirmative action will not be given recognition and the desired end of creating a workforce representative of South African society together with the goal of substantive equality cannot be realised.

Highlights

  • The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa1 through section 23 paved the way towards addressing the inequality and discrimination that exists in the South African labour market

  • The paper will focus on the decision in Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security and National Commissioner of the South African Police Service which is an example of the disadvantages experienced by members of the designated groups who are part of a minority group within the designated groups

  • This paper highlights the multi-layered nature of disadvantage experienced by such members of the designated groups and the need to ensure that new forms of disadvantage are not created in the implementation of affirmative action policies by using a situation sensitive approach

Read more

Summary

H Papacostantis and M Mushariwa

How to cite this article Papacostantis H and Mushariwa M "The Impact of Minority Status in the Application Affirmative Action: Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)" PER / PELJ 2016(19) - DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/17273781/2016/v19i0a1160 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/17273781/2016/v19i0a1160

Introduction
Facts of the case
Constitutional standard to affirmative action
Representivity
Multi-layered nature of disadvantage
Gender discrimination
Minority status within the designated groups as a type of disadvantage
A situation-sensitive approach to affirmative action
Conclusion
Findings
Literature
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.