The impact of library preparation protocols on the consistency of allele frequency estimates in Pool-Seq data.

Abstract

Sequencing pools of individuals (Pool‐Seq) is a cost‐effective method to determine genome‐wide allele frequency estimates. Given the importance of meta‐analyses combining data sets, we determined the influence of different genomic library preparation protocols on the consistency of allele frequency estimates. We found that typically no more than 1% of the variation in allele frequency estimates could be attributed to differences in library preparation. Also read length had only a minor effect on the consistency of allele frequency estimates. By far, the most pronounced influence could be attributed to sequence coverage. Increasing the coverage from 30‐ to 50‐fold improved the consistency of allele frequency estimates by at least 27%. We conclude that Pool‐Seq data can be easily combined across different library preparation methods, but sufficient sequence coverage is key to reliable results.