Abstract

Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncertainties in deglacial history and Earth rheology. The Earth models adopted in many GIA studies are defined by parameters that vary in the radial direction only and represent a global average Earth structure (referred to as 1-D Earth models). Oversimplifying the actual Earth structure leads to bias in model predictions in regions where Earth parameters differ significantly from the global average, such as West Antarctica. We investigate the impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on GIA in Antarctica by carrying out two experiments that use different rheological approaches to define 3-D Earth models that include spatial variations in lithospheric thickness. The first experiment defines an elastic lithosphere with spatial variations in thickness inferred from seismic studies.We compare the results from this 3-D model with results derived from a 1-D Earth model that has a uniform lithospheric thickness defined as the average of the 3-D lithospheric thickness. Irrespective of the deglacial history and sublithospheric mantle viscosity, we find higher gradients of present-day uplift rates (i.e. higher amplitude and shorter wavelength) in West Antarctica when using the 3-D models, due to the thinner-than-1-D-average lithosphere prevalent in this region. The second experiment uses seismically inferred temperature as an input to a power-law rheology, thereby allowing the lithosphere to have a viscosity structure. Modelling the lithosphere with a powerlaw rheology results in a behaviour that is equivalent to a thinner lithospheremodel, and it leads to higher amplitude and shorter wavelength deformation compared with the first experiment. We conclude that neglecting spatial variations in lithospheric thickness in GIA models will result in predictions of peak uplift and subsidence that are biased low in West Antarctica. This has important implications for ice-sheet modelling studies as the steeper gradients of uplift predicted from the more realistic 3-D model may promote stability in marine-grounded regions of West Antarctica. Including lateral variations in lithospheric thickness, at least to the level of considering West and East Antarctica separately, is important for capturing shortwavelength deformation and it has the potential to provide a better fit to Global Positioning System observations as well as an improved GIA correction for the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment data.

Highlights

  • The process of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) in Antarctica is well-studied (e.g.Whitehouse et al, 2012b, A et al, 2013, Argus et al, 2014) but GIA models continue to predict remarkably different present-day deformation rates (Martín-Español et al, 2016) due to large uncertainties that persist in both the ice-sheet history since the Last GlacialMaximum (LGM) and the Earth structure in this region

  • The aim of this study is to isolate the effect of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on GIA in West Antarctica to determine the effect on gradients of present-day uplift rates when compared with a 1D Earth model

  • In this study we have shown that, irrespective of deglacial history and sub-lithospheric mantle viscosity, the use of a spatially variable elastic lithospheric thickness in a GIA model of Antarctica results in higher gradients of predicted present-day uplift rates in West Antarctica compared with a uniform elastic lithospheric thickness that is the average of the former

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maximum (LGM) and the Earth structure in this region This has a direct impact on estimates of ice-mass loss derived from satellite gravimetry In reality the structure of the Earth is far more complex and models that reflect lateral as well as vertical variations in Earth properties are needed to provide more accurate predictions of present-day GIA-related deformation and geoid changes, both in Antarctica (A et al, 2013, van der Wal et al, 2015, Sasgen et al., 2017) and elsewhere, for example Greenland (Khan et al, 2016). Including 3D structure in GIA models is pertinent for Antarctica as this continent is considered to consist of two distinct regions in terms of Earth structure: a thick cratonic lithosphere and highviscosity uppermost mantle in the East, and thinner lithosphere and lower-viscosity uppermost mantle in the West (Morelli and Danesi, 2004).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call