Abstract
Based on the theoretical distinction between genuine, mediated and staged events, the causes and consequences of waves of news coverage are analysed. It is assumed that key events change the criteria for the selection of news and stimulate new activities which in turn get covered by the media. It is further assumed that, as a consequence, the news coverage creates the false impression of an increasing number of genuine events — occurrences which by definition cannot be influenced by media coverage — even if their actual number remains unchanged. This is due to the fact that the media report more often on past events, give new events more coverage and make both appear very similar to the key event. The theoretical assumptions are analysed with respect to coverage on AIDS, earthquakes and truck accidents before and after three key events.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
