Abstract

BackgroundMultiple definitions are used to investigate injuries in musicians, resulting in a wide range of prevalence rates. The aim of this study is to establish the impact of different injury definitions on the prevalence of injuries and disability in classical music students. Moreover, the practical implications of using different injury definitions are considered.MethodsA prospective cohort study among first-year classical music students was performed using bi-monthly questionnaires focusing on injuries. Three injury definitions were used: 1) all MSK complaints injury (any MSK complaint resulting in a VAS pain score > 0 in the past eight weeks), 2) medical attention injury (any MSK complaint that resulted in a student consulting a health provider in the past eight weeks), 3) time-loss injury (any MSK complaint that resulted in partly/completely missing music classes or activities in the past eight weeks). For all injury definitions prevalences were calculated and compared. Furthermore, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand performing arts module (DASH-pa) was used to calculate disability scores for all three injury definitions.ResultsTwenty-nine classical music students participated in the current study. The total response rate over one academic year was 85.3%. One year prevalences of all MSK complaints, medical attention and time-loss were 96.6, 17.2 and 13.8% respectively. The bi-monthly prevalences ranged from 74.1 to 96.0% for all MSK complaints, from 5.6 to 11.5% for medical attention injuries and from 0 to 11.5% for time loss injuries. Scores on the DASH-pa ranged from 15.6 to 26.9 for MSK complaints, 33.3 to 50 for medical attention and 47.9 to 62.5 for time-loss injuries.ConclusionThe choice of injury definition is a critical factor affecting the outcome of music injury surveillance studies. To reach a consensus, it is therefore important to consider the different injury definitions depending on the goal of the injury surveillance and the practical implications.

Highlights

  • Multiple definitions are used to investigate injuries in musicians, resulting in a wide range of prevalence rates

  • All MSK complaints injury In total, 28 out of 29 students reported at least one MSK complaint (VAS > 0) during the academic year, resulting in a one year prevalence of 96.6%

  • Medical attention injury In total, five out of 29 students visited a health provider throughout the academic year, resulting in a one-year prevalence of medical attention injuries of 17.2%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multiple definitions are used to investigate injuries in musicians, resulting in a wide range of prevalence rates. Musicians are at risk for injuries during their career. They usually experience high musculoskeletal (MSK) and psychosocial demands within their profession [1,2,3]. Professional musicians practice daily for many hours in which they constantly repeat physical movements in ergonomically unfavorable postures to reach an elite level [1]. Beginning in their music education, music students experience more MSK complaints compared to age-matched medical students [4]. To develop effective preventive measurements, it is essential to establish the extent of the injury [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call