Abstract

The impact of individuals’ mobility on the degree of error in estimates of exposure to ambient PM concentrations is increasingly reported in the literature. However, the degree to which accounting for mobility reduces error likely varies as a function of two related factors—individuals’ routine travel patterns and the local variations of air pollution fields. We investigated whether individuals’ routine travel patterns moderate the impact of mobility on individual long-term exposure assessment. Here, we have used real-world time–activity data collected from 2013 participants in Erie/Niagara counties, New York, USA, matched with daily PM predictions obtained from two spatial exposure models. We further examined the role of the spatiotemporal representation of ambient PM as a second moderator in the relationship between an individual’s mobility and the exposure measurement error using a random effect model. We found that the effect of mobility on the long-term exposure estimates was significant, but that this effect was modified by individuals’ routine travel patterns. Further, this effect modification was pronounced when the local variations of ambient PM concentrations were captured from multiple sources of air pollution data (‘a multi-sourced exposure model’). In contrast, the mobility effect and its modification were not detected when ambient PM concentration was estimated solely from sparse monitoring data (‘a single-sourced exposure model’). This study showed that there was a significant association between individuals’ mobility and the long-term exposure measurement error. However, the effect could be modified by individuals’ routine travel patterns and the error-prone representation of spatiotemporal variability of PM.

Highlights

  • Environmental health studies have routinely conducted exposure assessments using pollutant measurements from sparse networks of monitors matched with the locations of home addresses of individuals [1,2]

  • To better understand the effect of mobility on individuals’ long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5, we developed a statistical model for mobility, individuals’ routine travel patterns and spatial exposure models

  • The results strongly suggested that mobility has a statistically significant effect on personal long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental health studies have routinely conducted exposure assessments using pollutant measurements from sparse networks of monitors matched with the locations of home addresses of individuals [1,2]. Reliance on these networks leads to measurement error in exposure assessments because they are unable to capture high spatial heterogeneity in pollution fields [3,4]. This approach, which focuses only on individuals’ location of residences, ignores time-activities of individuals and fails to assess dynamic exposure to air pollution [5,6,7,8,9]. Satellitederived aerosol optical depth (AOD) and the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call