Abstract

BackgroundInpatient treatment is not the most beneficial treatment setting for many patients with psychiatric disorders and overcrowding is a recurrent problem for psychiatric hospitals. Therefore, it is important to develop strategies to limit avoidable inpatient treatment. This study sought to evaluate the impact of an emergency hotline that was developed to better manage psychiatric patients, particularly for identifying those requiring a hospital admission.MethodsThis pre-post intervention quality improvement study compared changes in the management of psychiatric patients’ admission before and after the introduction of an emergency hotline where a specialist in psychiatry examines all inpatient referral from private practitioners.Main outcomes were the change in proportion of hospital admissions after referral from a private practitioner before and within 3 months after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were the average length of hospital stay, proportion of non-voluntary admission, the time required for triage and the impact of the intervention on treatments’ costs. Fisher’s Exact test was used to test the primary hypothesis of difference in the proportion of hospitalized patients before and after introduction of the emergency hotline. Secondary outcomes were tested with Student’s t-test for continuous variables and Fishers’s Exact test for proportions.ResultsAmong 45 admission requests from private practitioners during the 3 months after introduction of the new emergency hotline, 25 (55.6%) were accepted as inpatient treatment, while 20 (44%) were redirected to more appropriate outpatient treatments. There was a highly significant difference from the baseline period during which all 34 requests were accepted (44% vs 100%, p < 0.001). In addition, for the patients hospitalized after the introduction of the emergency hotline there was a trend-level reduction of the average length of stay (9.32 days vs 17.35 days).ConclusionImplementation of an emergency hotline manage by a specialist in psychiatry for admissions to acute psychiatric wards is feasible and simple to use. Importantly, it allows to significantly decrease the proportion of hospitalizations. Additional studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these exploratory results to other health care settings.

Highlights

  • Inpatient treatment is not the most beneficial treatment setting for many patients with psychiatric disorders and overcrowding is a recurrent problem for psychiatric hospitals

  • Admissions During the two 3-months periods of interest in 2018 and 2019, 566 patients were overall hospitalized in psychiatry division at Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève (HUG) (309 in 2018 and 257 in 2019)

  • Concerning our primary outcome, N = 88 (N = 34 in 2018 and N = 54 in 2019) hospitalizations were requested by private practitioners after exclusion of patients according to our selection criteria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inpatient treatment is not the most beneficial treatment setting for many patients with psychiatric disorders and overcrowding is a recurrent problem for psychiatric hospitals. Hospital treatment and management of psychiatric patients is one of the most expensive care that can be provide to psychiatric patients [8, 9]. Despite highly developed outpatient networks in many developed countries, overcrowding of inpatient psychiatry services remains a common problem [10,11,12,13]. This overcrowding is problematic in terms of inadequate conditions with respect to rooms and other facilities, and in terms of the quality of care. It is well established that overcrowded units have negative impact on staff who are less able to offer optimal care to patients [14,15,16]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call