Abstract

Tissue engineered cartilage substitutes, which induce the process of endochondral ossification, represent a regenerative strategy for bone defect healing. Such constructs typically consist of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) forming a cartilage template in vitro, which can be implanted to stimulate bone formation in vivo. The use of MSCs of allogeneic origin could potentially improve the clinical utility of the tissue engineered cartilage constructs in three ways. First, ready-to-use construct availability can speed up the treatment process. Second, MSCs derived and expanded from a single donor could be applied to treat several patients and thus the costs of the medical interventions would decrease. Finally, it would allow more control over the quality of the MSC chondrogenic differentiation. However, even though the envisaged clinical use of allogeneic cell sources for bone regeneration is advantageous, their immunogenicity poses a significant obstacle to their clinical application. The aim of this review is to increase the awareness of the role played by immune cells during endochondral ossification, and in particular during regenerative strategies when the immune response is altered by the presence of implanted biomaterials and/or cells. More specifically, we focus on how this balance between immune response and bone regeneration is affected by the implantation of a cartilaginous tissue engineered construct of allogeneic origin.

Highlights

  • Intramembranous ossification, which involves the direct differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into osteoblastic cells, is mainly found in bone healing of fractures characterized by high mechanical stability due to the presence of, for example, rigid fixation.[2,8]

  • endochondral bone regeneration (EBR) is detailed before we propose a speculative analysis of the feasibility of using allogeneic, chondrogenically differentiated MSCs for EBR

  • No agreement exists regarding the optimal differentiation status before implantation.[4,46]. These issues were explored in a recent publication by Yang et al.,[47] where the effect of the infiltrating macrophages acquire a pro-inflammatory phenotype (M1), secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ).[54]

Read more

Summary

The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration

Tissue engineered cartilage substitutes, which induce the process of endochondral ossification, represent a regenerative strategy for bone defect healing. Such constructs typically consist of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) forming a cartilage template in vitro, which can be implanted to stimulate bone formation in vivo. The use of MSCs of allogeneic origin could potentially improve the clinical utility of the tissue engineered cartilage constructs in three ways. MSCs derived and expanded from a single donor could be applied to treat several patients and the costs of the medical interventions would decrease. We focus on how this balance between immune response and bone regeneration is affected by the implantation of a cartilaginous tissue engineered construct of allogeneic origin

INTRODUCTION
Published in partnership with the Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute
Endochondral bone formation in fracture healing
EBR strategies
Crosstalk between immune cells and bone remodeling
Findings
AND BONE FORMATION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call