The Impact of Homogenization Techniques and Conditions on Water‐In‐Oil Emulsions for Casein Hydrolysate–Loaded Double Emulsions: A Comparative Study

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study aims to evaluate homogenization techniques and conditions for producing stable, small droplet‐size water‐in‐oil (W/O) emulsions intended for incorporation into casein hydrolysate–loaded double emulsions. Three commonly used homogenization methods; rotor–stator, ultrasonic, and high‐pressure homogenization were individually optimized utilizing response surface methodology. Instances of over‐processing were observed, particularly with the rotor–stator and ultrasonic homogenizers under specific conditions. Nevertheless, optimal conditions were identified for each technique: 530 s at 17,800 rpm agitation speed for the rotor–stator homogenizer, 139 s at 39% amplitude for the ultrasonic homogenizer, and 520 s at 1475 bar for the high‐pressure homogenizer. Subsequently, the W/O emulsions produced under optimal conditions and their respective W1/O/W2 double emulsions were compared. The rotor–stator and high‐pressure homogenized W/O emulsions exhibited comparable narrow droplet‐size distributions, as indicated by similar Span values. However, high‐pressure homogenization failed to sufficiently minimize droplet size. Ultrasonic homogenization resulted in droplets at the 1‐μm scale but yielded more polydisperse droplet‐size distribution. According to TOPSIS analysis, an emulsion with a viscosity of 93.1 cP (centiPoise), a stability index of 93.8%, a D(90) of 0.67 μm (0th day), and a D(90) of 0.75 μm (30th day) produced using a rotor–stator was selected. Additionally, double emulsions containing primary emulsions prepared with the rotor–stator method demonstrated higher viscosity, narrower droplet‐size distribution, and lower creaming compared to other samples. This investigation sheds light on the influence of homogenization techniques on emulsion properties, providing valuable insights for optimizing double emulsion formulations.