Abstract
Scholars have argued about the impact of fiscal decentralisation on public spending for a long time without coming to any firm theoretical and empirical conclusions. In contrast to earlier studies, this paper looks at the impact of fiscal decentralisation across different types of spending. It is argued that the impact varies and can be positive or negative, depending on the distribution of spending across levels of government. A simple model is developed to show that local competition in the provision of local/regional public goods (e.g. education) can result in higher spending. However, when public goods are provided at the national level (e.g. pension policies), fiscal decentralisation encourages local policy pre-emption, thus lowering spending. The model is tested empirically by means of a pooled time series analysis of education, social spending and public spending in OECD countries from 1980 to 2001.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
