Abstract
This paper examines whether auditors of firms with higher financial risk disclose less boilerplate of KAMs. Our empirical study demonstrates that KAMs are more differentiated if the firms are subject to higher financial risk. This association is only pronounced for client firms in the weaker legal environment and audit firms with larger market shares. In addition, client pressure will weaken the motivation of auditors to differentiate KAMs of firms with a higher level of financial risk. We also find that auditors are more likely to differentiate KAMs related to firms’ profitability if firms are subject to high financial risk.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
