Abstract
PurposeTo compare the anatomical outcomes of different extents of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in idiopathic macular hole surgery.MethodsProspective, parallel‐group, randomized clinical trial. A total of 121 eyes of 121 patients with idiopathic macular hole underwent pars plana vitrectomy, and peeling of the ILM with a diameter of two disk diameters (DD) or 4DD based on randomization. The main outcome was the proportion of eyes with complete hole closure at 12 months. The second outcome was the hole closure grading stratified by macular hole closure index (MHCI) at each visit.ResultsAt 12 months, there was no significant difference in anatomical outcomes with complete closure achieved in 52 (82.5%) of 63 eyes in the 2DD group and 53 (91.4%) of 58 eyes in the 4DD group (p = 0.15). For subjects with MHCI ≤0.5 (n = 24), complete closure rate was significantly lower in the 2DD group compared to the 4DD group (p = 0.012; 18.2% versus 75.9%, respectively). Average BCVA was lower in 2DD group than 4DD group (p = 0.014). By contrast, when MHCI was >0.5, the complete closure rate between the two groups showed no significant difference: 96.2% (50 patients) versus 95.6% (43 patients), respectively (p = 0.185).ConclusionIn patients with idiopathic full‐thickness macular hole and MHCI ≤0.5, a larger ILM peel of 4DD tends to achieve better anatomical outcomes than a more limited 2DD peel.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
