Abstract
In this paper, we investigate how exogenous shocks affect firms' innovative activities and also uncover the factors that can support and drive firms' innovation during crisis events. We underpin our conceptual framework on the cyclicality and procyclicality theory views and develop a quasi-replication methodology for Paunov's (2012) study, which used survey data collected by the OECD during the 2008–2009 global financial crisis (GFC) from eight Latin American countries (LAC). We use a new dataset covering 13 Caribbean economies (N = 1979), during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using Probit regression, we confirm that, like the GFC, the COVID-19 shock led many firms to stop ongoing innovation projects, corroborating Paunov's original findings and the procyclicality theory. Nevertheless, as we step-by-step extend the replication methodology we deviate from the original hypotheses and focus on uncovering which elements can support firms' innovation activities during adverse conditions. In doing so we find that funding was important to support new innovation activities during the COVID-19 pandemic and also that the size of firms' R&D department and their investments in product R&D and process R&D enhanced the development of innovations during this exogenous crisis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.