The impact of environmental variables on surface Conductance: Advancing simulation with a nonlinear Machine learning model

Abstract

Surface conductance (Gs) is a key factor in the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation; the interaction between environmental variables such as CO2 concentration, air temperature (TA), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), soil water content (SWC), and net radiation (R) affects Gs, evapotranspiration and thus impacts the hydrological cycle. These interactions are highly nonlinear and vary among different vegetation types. However, conventional Gs simulation models use fixed interactions between environmental variables in their equations for all vegetation types. Moreover, the characterisation and parameterisation of conventional Gs models is highly uncertain due to the high spatiotemporal variability in key environmental variables and plant parameters, which inhibits their generalisation. This study investigates whether Gs could be estimated more accurately by nonlinear statistical techniques that capture the multiple interactions between the environmental variables that affect Gs for each vegetation type. We compare mixed generalized additive model (MGAM) for Gs simulation with semi-empirical and empirical models at 20 eddy covariance flux tower sites with four different vegetation types at daily and monthly timescales. The results show that the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) in Gs simulation increased by up to 50% in MGAM model in comparison to the semi-empirical and empirical models. The MGAM model highlighted the interactive effects of CO2, VPD, and SWC for crops and grasses. The interactive effects of CO2, VPD, and TA were important for trees and grasses. The results from this study expand our understanding of the ability of Gs simulation models to identify and include the interactive effects of crucial environmental variables on plant transpiration and hydrological processes.