Abstract

In this study, the Natura 2000 nature protection network of the European Union is assessed in the context of soil quality management. We explore the hypothesis that the soil quality of croplands and grasslands — as indicated by soil organic carbon and phosphorus levels — is better in terms of environmental parameters within the Natura 2000 network than outside it.The soil organic carbon and phosphorus content of 479 cropland and 450 grassland sites within Natura 2000 were compared with their nearest neighbours outside the network. The comparisons were repeated for pairs of both cropland and grassland sites by soil texture groups.The study revealed that organic carbon content was significantly higher in Natura 2000 sites than in non-protected areas for both croplands and grasslands. For croplands, this was true only for those with signs of ploughing, whereas for croplands without signs of ploughing there were no significant differences between Natura 2000 and non-protected areas.Areas with sand and loamy sand soils had significantly higher soil organic carbon content within the Natura 2000 network than outside it, for both croplands and grasslands. This was the only texture class that showed a significant difference in the case of croplands, whereas three further texture groups had higher soil organic carbon content in Natura 2000 grassland sites than on grassland sites outside this network.There was no significant difference in soil phosphorus content between areas within the Natura 2000 network and non-protected areas, except for grasslands with light textured soils, where soil phosphorus levels were significantly lower within Natura 2000 sites than outside them.The results suggest that the management of croplands and grasslands of Natura 2000 sites tends to perform better than that of adjacent areas with similar land cover in terms of soil carbon conservation. The difference is more evident for sites with certain soil characteristics. On the other hand, the nutrient input - as determined by phosphorus levels - of Natura 2000 croplands and grasslands generally does not appear to be less intensive than that of surrounding areas outside the network.

Highlights

  • The Natura 2000 nature protection network is the most important establishment of the European Union's (EU's) biodiversity strategy (Sundseth and Creed, 2008)

  • The agricultural areas of Natura 2000 sites can contribute to various ecosystem services, including global climate regulation, by preventing carbon loss from soils through sustainable management practices (European Commission, 2013)

  • Based on the studied pairs of LUCAS points, we found no significant difference in topsoil phosphorus content between mineral soils of croplands within and outside Natura 2000 areas (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Natura 2000 nature protection network is the most important establishment of the European Union's (EU's) biodiversity strategy (Sundseth and Creed, 2008). As the below-ground environment hosts a large portion of terrestrial biodiversity (Jeffery et al, 2010), the role of Natura 2000 sites in preserving soil life should be recognised. The EU's biodiversity protection strategy aims to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services. The agricultural areas of Natura 2000 sites can contribute to various ecosystem services, including global climate regulation, by preventing carbon loss from soils through sustainable management practices (European Commission, 2013). About two thirds of terrestrial carbon is below ground (Batjes, 1996). The role of SOC in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is crucial. The Kyoto Protocol allows carbon emissions to be offset by the demonstrable removal of carbon from the

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call