Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that activity patterns in early visual areas predict stimulus properties actively maintained in visual working memory. Yet, the mechanisms by which such information is represented remain largely unknown. In this study, observers remembered the orientations of 4 briefly presented gratings, one in each quadrant of the visual field. A 10Hz Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) triplet was applied directly at stimulus offset, or midway through a 2-second delay, targeting early visual cortex corresponding retinotopically to a sample item in the lower hemifield. Memory for one of the four gratings was probed at random, and participants reported this orientation via method of adjustment. Recall errors were smaller when the visual field location targeted by TMS overlapped with that of the cued memory item, compared to errors for stimuli probed diagonally to TMS. This implied topographic storage of orientation information, and a memory-enhancing effect at the targeted location. Furthermore, early pulses impaired performance at all four locations, compared to late pulses. Next, response errors were fit empirically using a mixture model to characterize memory precision and guess rates. Memory was more precise for items proximal to the pulse location, irrespective of pulse timing. Guesses were more probable with early TMS pulses, regardless of stimulus location. Thus, while TMS administered at the offset of the stimulus array might disrupt early-phase consolidation in a non-topographic manner, TMS also boosts the precise representation of an item at its targeted retinotopic location, possibly by increasing attentional resources or by injecting a beneficial amount of noise.

Highlights

  • Humans sense the world in a highly visual fashion–the flow of information from the eyes gives rise to an ostensibly effortless and seamless picture of our external environment

  • We compared the absolute error at four relative distances from the visual field location targeted by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), and at two time points at which TMS was applied

  • Proximity of an item maintained in memory to the visual field location targeted by TMS had a facilitative effect on memory performance, as indexed by smaller errors for items proximal to the pulsed location (main effect of relative location; F(3,21) = 3.483; p = 0.034; Fig 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans sense the world in a highly visual fashion–the flow of information from the eyes gives rise to an ostensibly effortless and seamless picture of our external environment. Visual perception requires the brain to form an ongoing internal representation of all the information we are perceiving and perceived just moments ago, even if this information can no longer be sensed directly. TMS over visual cortex during short-term memory

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.