Abstract
The vulnerability of product evaluations to influence from unattended distraction material was used as an indicator of processing differences between category-based and attribute-based evaluation. Subjects listened to descriptions of products having attributes that were either high or low prototypically to the product category. Evaluatively consistent or inconsistent material was added to both the high prototypically and the low-prototypically descriptions. Subjects instructed to evaluate the products attended to these descriptions on one channel of a set of stereo headphones, while they were simultaneously exposed to either positively or negatively toned material on the unattended channel. Subjects' evaluations of products high in prototypically were not influenced by the affective quality of the unattended material, whereas evaluations of the products low in prototypically were influenced. Subjects' evaluations suggested that both category-based and attribute-based processing occurred, but to different categories in instances that were either high or low in prototypically for the product class.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.