Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of discourse marker (DM) instruction on fluency, accuracy, and complexity improvement of Iranian intermediate EFL learner’s writing. To this aim, among the two hundred forth year English major learners in Dezful university, Iran, fifty of them who were in the intermediate level, based on the scoring system of the university, were recruited. They were given a topic to write before intervention. Then, the fifty participants passed through twenty-hour instruction on micro and macro DMs, based on Belles-Furtuno’s (2004) classification of discourse markers. The mentioned classification included both sentential and supra sentential markers. In the process of explicit instruction (EI) of DMs, they were given various exercises and activities to apply DMs and learn the function and usage of these units and input flood (IF) was performed along with corrective feedback (CF) with the help of the teacher with their mistakes and misunderstandings of DMs. After intervention, they were given another topic to write to examine if EI+IF of DMs could help them improve fluency, accuracy, and complexity of their writing. To quantify the results the Wolfe-Quintero (1998) method was used and it was unveiled that all the three components of writing improved after intervention, which practically means instruction of DMs could enhance learner’s writing in the three aspects. The findings can be used by teachers and syllabus designers to consider DMs as one of the most crucial components in writing courses.

Highlights

  • According to Hillocks (2005) writing has always played an important and undeniable role in the process of teaching, especially when it comes to academic setting

  • Based on Wolfe-Quintero (1998) complexity in frequency aspect was calculated by the number of connectors of all types which is the same way with what was introduced for measuring accuracy

  • The results of this study reveal that learners’ had not been taught on discourse marker (DM) properly, owing to the fact that they could outperform in their post writing in fluency aspect which shows that teachers’ lack of awareness of the use and importance of these units could have been the root of the complication

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to Hillocks (2005) writing has always played an important and undeniable role in the process of teaching, especially when it comes to academic setting. Writing as a demanding and sophisticated task requires high level of familiarity and awareness of the target language to enable the writer to express his ideas through combination of words and be informative enough to the reader. As Belles-Fortuno (2004) claimed having the above features need goof ties in both sentential and supra-sentential levels of the language being produced. The first stage is language level which includes vocabulary and grammar can be called the “micro level”. The second stage is the layout, punctuation and method of organizing ideas or “macro level”. He claimed that the second stage is mostly ignored or given little attention to. Producing a coherent and well-connected writing is hard to be expected

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.