The impact of different anticoagulants and antiplatelets regimens on acute epistaxis outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (AP) on the management of acute epistaxis remains unclear. This study investigated the association between AC/AP therapy and treatment outcomes in patients with acute epistaxis.MethodologyA retrospective analysis of patients presented to the otolaryngology emergency room with acute epistaxis (2014–2022). Patients were categorized based on their regular medications: AP, dual AP therapy (DAPT), new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), or no regular AC/AP use (control group). Outcome measures included rates of minor interventions (chemical or electrical cautery, nasal tamponade), major interventions (endoscopic ligation, embolization), recurrent emergency department visits, admission rates, and duration.Results786 patients were included with an average follow-up period of 52.56 ± 20.4 months. Compared to the control group, patients on AP, DAPT, or VKA had significantly higher rates of minor interventions (63.1% vs. 74.4%, 79.6%, and 77.3%, respectively, p < 0.05). DAPT users exhibited a higher rate of major interventions than the control (5.6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.053). NOAC users showed no significant difference in minor interventions compared to control and required no major interventions. Both NOAC and VKA users had significantly higher rates of recurrent epistaxis events and prolonged hospitalization compared to the control (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively).ConclusionsNOAC demonstrated more favorable outcomes than VKA in patients with acute epistaxis, and DAPT use was associated with an increased need for major interventions. These findings suggest a more conservative approach in NOAC users than other AC/AP agents.