Abstract
This article presents an algebraic treatment of the impact of diagnostic hierarchies on the estimation of prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders. A method for correcting for this “hierarchy effect” is developed and illustrated. Using the terminology of Boyd et al., when the dominant disorder is common and/or the odds ratio for the dominant and the excluded disorders is high, the observed prevalence of an excluded disorder can substantially underestimate its true prevalence. This “hierarchy effect” can be particularly important in genetic-epidemiologic investigations which compare the prevalence of an excluded disorder in two populations which differ in the prevalence of the dominant disorder. The impact of certain kinds of diagnostic hierarchies can be easily understood and corrected for; with others, particularly those based on etiologic assumptions, a straight-forward interpretation is not always possible.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
