Abstract

Does the use of diagnostic criteria in the hysteroscopic diagnosis of a septate uterus improve inter-observer agreement? Pre-set diagnostic criteria slightly improve the inter-observer reproducibility of hysteroscopy in diagnosing a uterine septum, although agreement remains moderate. The inter-observer agreement on the hysteroscopic diagnosis of the septate uterus has been reported to be poor. From April 2013 until May 2014, a randomized controlled comparative inter-observer study was performed. A total of 191 gynecologists from 43 countries took part. Each gynecologist was asked to assess 10 video recordings of hysteroscopy procedures with a specific focus on the internal uterine shape. The hysteroscopies had been performed in subfertile women and women with recurrent miscarriage. The recordings contained images of uterine cavities primarily diagnosed as septate, arcuate or normal. Participating gynecologists were randomized into two groups: one group received diagnostic criteria for a septate uterus before assessment of the videos (DC group), whereas the other group assessed the recordings without instruction (no DC group). The inter-observer agreement, expressed as the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), was compared between groups. Main outcomes were the inter-observer agreement on the uterine shape and the necessity of surgical correction. Eighty-six observers were randomized to the DC group and 105 to the no DC group. The ICCs in the diagnosis of a septum were 0.59 versus 0.52, in the DC group and the non-DC group, respectively (P-value: 0.002). The overall agreement on the need for surgical correction was found to be moderate (DC ICC 0.43 versus no DC 0.39, P-value: 0.70). Most importantly, once a septate uterus had been diagnosed, the agreement on the need for surgery was poor in both groups (DC ICC 0.05 versus no DC ICC 0.02, P-value: 0.78). We used video recordings rather than studying real-time hysteroscopic procedures, which may have influenced the accuracy of the assessments. The reproducibility of hysteroscopy for the diagnosis of a septate uterus is moderate, even with the use of standardized criteria. The fact that the agreement among physicians on both the diagnosis of a uterine septum, as well as the decision to resect such septum after hysteroscopy is moderate, may imply that hysteroscopy is insufficient as single tool to diagnose and decide on treatment of a septate uterus. No study funding was received and no competing interests are present.

Highlights

  • Office hysteroscopy is increasingly used as a screening tool in subfertile women

  • The agreement on the need for surgery when a septate uterus had been diagnosed was poor (DC intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.05 versus no DC ICC: 0.02, P-value: 0.78). This is the first study that investigates the impact of the application of pre-set criteria on the reproducibility of the hysteroscopic diagnosis of the septate uterus

  • This study shows that using diagnostic criteria improves the inter-observer agreement for the hysteroscopic diagnosis of the septate uterus, but that the level of agreement remains moderate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Office hysteroscopy is increasingly used as a screening tool in subfertile women. The reported prevalence of intrauterine abnormalities in this population shows considerable variation (11–45%) (Oliveira et al, 2003; Bosteels et al, 2010; Fatemi et al, 2010). The new European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification defines a septate uterus as a uterus with a normal outline and an internal indentation at the fundal midline exceeding 50% of the uterine wall thickness (Grimbizis et al, 2013). This classification is of limited use for hysteroscopy, as the thickness of the uterine wall cannot be determined during this procedure

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.