Abstract
The relationship between contractual governance and partner opportunism is widely discussed in the interfirm governance literature. However, a consensus regarding whether contractual governance increases ex post opportunism or whether such opportunism can be curtailed by contractual or social governance is lacking. We believe that this inconclusive state is due to the insufficient demarcation between different types of opportunism and the unclear temporal treatment of contracts. The findings from 227 firms with interfirm cooperation experience reveal that ex ante contract completeness reduces ex post strong form opportunism while increasing weak form opportunism in a curvilinear manner. Moreover, ex post contractual enforcement alleviates the negative impact of strong form opportunism on cooperation performance but shows no significant influence on the negative effect of weak form opportunism. Conversely, ex post social enforcement alleviates the negative impact of weak form opportunism, suggesting a match between forms of opportunism and types of enforcement. Our study advances the understanding of contract design and the use of governance mechanisms within interfirm relationships.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
