Abstract

Sustainable development entails various development patterns commonly associated with compact and mixed development that usually leads to reduced driving, more public transportation utilization, lower energy consumption, better walkability, and improved public health. To examine if the benefits of compact and mixed development are reflected in land value, this study sets forth to measure development compactness and land use mix and assesses the impacts of such patterns on land value. Impacts of accessibility to jobs, retail stores, and public transportation on land value are also investigated and compared to the impacts from development patterns. The study finds that: (1) accessibility has greater impacts than development pattern on land value; (2) compact development and mixed land use influence land value differently depending on the nature of existing land uses and land values; (3) accessibility to jobs and retail stores always contributes to the increase of land value; and (4) accessibility to public transportation helps but it does not influence land value in a consistent fashion. The results suggest that areas with higher residential property values, good proximity to the city center, less industrial land uses, and good access to jobs and retail stores have greater potential to realize an increase of land value resulted from compact and mixed development in Richmond, Virginia.

Highlights

  • Over the past two decades sustainable development has emerged to become one of the viable ways to combat the negative consequences of urban sprawl

  • Compact development and mixed land use influence land value differently depending on the nature of existing land uses and land values

  • Accessibility to jobs and retail stores always contributes to the increase of land value

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past two decades sustainable development has emerged to become one of the viable ways to combat the negative consequences of urban sprawl. Other studies have shown that the increase of property values does not benefit much from the proximity to public transportation but rather the property’s characteristics and its neighborhood features [31,32,33]. When it comes to property values, a property can be separated into its land and improvement which are assessed separately but sold together as one property in the market. Due to the unique nature of land being stationary and limited in quantity, land value generally reflects its current use and development potential, which is influenced by its location and external factors like accessibility and surrounding land uses. I choose to use land value in this study as the dependent variable, a proxy variable representing a property’s land use potential

Study Aim and Scope
Study Area The and Geographic
Materials andand
Accessibility toThe
Results
Collinearity Diagnostics
Regression Analysis 1
Regression Analysis 2
Regression Analysis 3
Discussion
Model 1—Low Land Value Group
Model 2—Medium Land Value Group
Model 3—High Land Value Group
Implications
Limintations and Future Research
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call