Abstract

Background: The early stages of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic left many hospital systems devoid of personal protective equipment. Community-driven groups manufactured Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as a form of temporary replacement until supply could increase to frontline healthcare workers. The purpose of this study was to survey hospital systems in Alabama and Mississippi who requested and received PPE to determine recipient opinions concerning community involvement. Methods: A 15-question Qualtrics survey was distributed to hospital systems who requested and received community-generated PPE (CGPPE) from the group known as Alabama Fighting COVID. 275 responses were gathered over a period of 6 months. Results: Survey data showed that most respondents from healthcare and healthcare-associated professions responded that wearing community generated personal protective equipment provided them with the perception of added protection (55.31% of participants selected either "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"), and that it improved their outlook and desire to work during the pandemic (51.77% of participants selected either "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"). Conclusions: Most respondents reported that wearing community generated personal protective equipment not only provided them with the perception of added protection, but that it improved their outlook and desire to work during the pandemic. With these responses in mind, our study raises questions concerning whether local CGPPE distribution could improve well-ness outcomes of healthcare workers (HCWs) not only in relation to decreased viral transmission, but also in favorable psychosocial health assessments. Further implications for research concerning community involvement during future medical crises are indicated, especially with the current rise of the delta variant strain.

Highlights

  • The initial SARS COVID pandemic introduced new challenges in the world health community as the viral illness passed from person to person at an alarming rate

  • This study proposes two possible solutions to partially alleviate said burden: access to protective equipment (PPE) and social support

  • An original survey developed by the research team consisting of 15 questions was distributed via the Qualtrics platform by email to hospital systems, local clinics, and nursing homes in the Dothan, AL; Birmingham, AL; and Gulfport, MS areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The initial SARS COVID pandemic introduced new challenges in the world health community as the viral illness passed from person to person at an alarming rate. Community generated personal protective equipment (CGPPE) came in several forms, including, but not limited to, hand-sewn masks, 3d printed face shields and “ear savers” [1]. The term “ear savers” refers to small clips used to fasten mask elastic behind the neck instead of placing them on the ears. These were distributed in hospitals, clinics, dental offices, and other essential “front line” points of care [1]. The early stages of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic left many hospital systems devoid of personal protective equipment. Community-driven groups manufactured Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as a form of temporary replacement until supply could increase to frontline healthcare workers. The purpose of this study was to survey hospital systems in Alabama and Mississippi who requested and received PPE to determine recipient opinions concerning community involvement

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call