Abstract

The impact of CMOS technology scaling on the second breakdown of ESD protection devices has been investigated using 2-D simulations and analytical calculations. It is shown that the second breakdown trigger current (It 2 ) can not be reliably used as an ESD robustness criterion in sub-0.18 um ESD protection devices. When a technology feature size is reduced, the doping of drain and drain extension regions is significantly increased. Thus, the ESD device failure due to the self-heating effect occurs without the second snapback region in high current I-V curve and It 2 current can not be properly extracted. Instead of It 2 current criterion, we propose to use the maximum failure temperature criterion.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.