Abstract
Regional cancer genetics services in the UK base many of their risk assessments on the careful evaluation of a family history of disease. The pathological details of cancers in relatives can help refine this risk assessment and alter subsequent management. By analysing a variety of medical records, we surveyed how often a reported family history was discrepant from that recorded in the records, and how often this impacted on surveillance recommendations. Our survey analysed pathology confirmation and risk assessment in families over a 7-month period of referrals. 839 cancers were reported and 476 were independently confirmed. The accuracy of a reported family history differed depending on the reported site of a cancer and on the degree of relationship to the patient. Whilst the majority of reported cancers (84%) were confirmed, a change in risk assessment through pathology confirmation resulted in altered management in 20% of all referrals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.