Abstract
Background and MethodsIt is important to ensure that blood flow is modelled accurately in numerical studies of arteries featuring drug-eluting stents due to the significant proportion of drug transport from the stent into the arterial wall which is flow-mediated. Modelling blood is complicated, however, by variations in blood rheological behaviour between individuals, blood’s complex near-wall behaviour, and the large number of rheological models which have been proposed. In this study, a series of steady-state computational fluid dynamics analyses were performed in which the traditional Newtonian model was compared against a range of non-Newtonian models. The impact of these rheological models was elucidated through comparisons of haemodynamic flow details and drug transport behaviour at various blood flow rates.ResultsRecirculation lengths were found to reduce by as much as 24% with the inclusion of a non-Newtonian rheological model. Another model possessing the viscosity and density of blood plasma was also implemented to account for near-wall red blood cell losses and yielded recirculation length increases of up to 59%. However, the deviation from the average drug concentration in the tissue obtained with the Newtonian model was observed to be less than 5% in all cases except one. Despite the small sensitivity to the effects of viscosity variations, the spatial distribution of drug matter in the tissue was found to be significantly affected by rheological model selection.Conclusions/SignificanceThese results may be used to guide blood rheological model selection in future numerical studies. The clinical significance of these results is that they convey that the magnitude of drug uptake in stent-based drug delivery is relatively insensitive to individual variations in blood rheology. Furthermore, the finding that flow separation regions formed downstream of the stent struts diminish drug uptake may be of interest to device designers.
Highlights
Blood is a non-Newtonian fluid, flow in stented arteries has often been modelled numerically with a Newtonian blood model [1,2,3]
The Generalised Power Law, Walburn-Schneck and Carreau models produced similar recirculation length results to one another, smaller than the Newtonian model and generally larger than the Power Law model. Each of these non-Newtonian models tended to converge towards the haemodynamic behaviour of the Newtonian model as the flow rate increased, this behaviour was less evident in the three Casson models
Non-Newtonian effects were generally most pronounced at low flow rates and the choice of blood rheological model was found to influence flow patterns and drug transport
Summary
Blood is a non-Newtonian fluid, flow in stented arteries has often been modelled numerically with a Newtonian blood model [1,2,3]. Phillips et al [12] showed that the hæmatocrit decreases significantly in the aftermath of the angioplasty procedures used in stent implantation, likely from blood loss and fluid resuscitation. The Carreau non-Newtonian blood rheological model has been utilised in some past numerical analyses of stented arteries [4, 5] but unlike some other rheological models, such as the Walburn-Schneck and Casson models, it cannot simulate the effects of differences in hæmatocrit. A series of steady-state computational fluid dynamics analyses were performed in which the traditional Newtonian model was compared against a range of non-Newtonian models. The impact of these rheological models was elucidated through comparisons of haemodynamic flow details and drug transport behaviour at various blood flow rates
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
