Abstract

This paper is an attempt to empirically examine the impact of Basel Accord regulatory guidelines on the risk-based capital adequacy regulation and bank risk management of Vietnamese commercial banks. Our research aims to assess how Vietnamese commercial banks manage their capital ratio and bank risk under the latest Basel Accord capital adequacy ratio requirements. Building on previous studies, this research uses a simultaneous equation modeling (SiEM) with three-stage least squares regression (3SLS) to analyze the endogenous relationship between risk-based capital adequacy standards and bank risk management. A year dummy variable (dy2013) is included in the model to take account of changes in the regulation of the Vietnamese banking system. Furthermore, we add a value-at-risk variable developed by as an independent variable into equations of the empirical models. The results reveal a significant impact of Basel capital adequacy regulatory pressure on the risk-based capital adequacy standards and bank risk management of Vietnamese commercial banks. Moreover, banks under the latest Basel capital adequacy regulations are induced to reduce risks and increase banks’ financial performance.

Highlights

  • Risk-based capital adequacy regulation was implemented by the Basel Committee on Banking Regulation and Supervisory Practices in July 1988 to enhance the stability of banks and financial institutions (Jacques and Nigro 1997; Maji Santi 2015)

  • The results may be used to assist State Bank Vietnam (SBV) in guiding Vietnamese commercial banks by way of improving their capital ratio and take measures to reduce the proportion of risk-weighted assets under the risk-based capital adequacy regulatory standards mandated by the Basel Accords

  • The results show a positive influence of the latest Basel Accord on managing capital ratio and bank risk of Vietnamese commercial banks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Risk-based capital adequacy regulation was implemented by the Basel Committee on Banking Regulation and Supervisory Practices in July 1988 to enhance the stability of banks and financial institutions (Jacques and Nigro 1997; Maji Santi 2015). While the capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of banks complied with the risk-based capital requirements of Basel Accords, the problem regarding the adequacy of the capital requirements during periods of crises remained an open question (Jacques and Nigro 1997). The question led to increased interest in CAR for the banking system, which attracted researchers to study the relationship between capital adequacy regulation and bank risk in both developed and developing countries. Research by (Maji Santi 2015; Sirait and Rokhim 2019; Zhang et al 2008) found an inverse relationship between capital and bank risk

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call