Abstract

BackgroundThe number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to examine the factors associated with the number of citations of published articles, focusing on the article length.MethodsOriginal human studies published in the first trimester of 2006 in 5 major General Medicine journals were analyzed with regard to the number of authors and of author-affiliated institutions, title and abstract word count, article length (number of print pages), number of bibliographic references, study design, and 2006 journal impact factor (JIF). A multiple linear regression model was employed to identify the variables independently associated with the number of article citations received through January 2012.ResultsOn univariate analysis the JIF, number of authors, article length, study design (interventional/observational and prospective/retrospective), title and abstract word count, number of author-affiliated institutions, and number of references were all associated with the number of citations received. On multivariate analysis with the logarithm of citations as the dependent variable, only article length [regression coefficient: 14.64 (95% confidence intervals: (5.76–23.50)] and JIF [3.37 (1.80–4.948)] independently predicted the number of citations. The variance of citations explained by these parameters was 51.2%.ConclusionIn a sample of articles published in major General Medicine journals, in addition to journal impact factors, article length and number of authors independently predicted the number of citations. This may reflect a higher complexity level and quality of longer and multi-authored studies.

Highlights

  • An article’s citations are considered a measure of the scientific recognition the study has received, and an indicator of its value and impact on the scientific field [1]

  • The citations are the main factor determining the scientific impact of a journal, as expressed by the journal impact factor [2]

  • While the effect of journal impact factor [5,6,7,8,9,10] and study design [11,12,13,14,15,16] on citations received has been established by different studies, the published evidence on other potentially relevant variables, such as open access to the full text of the article, [17,18,19,20] or article length, [13] seems conflicting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An article’s citations are considered a measure of the scientific recognition the study has received, and an indicator of its value and impact on the scientific field [1]. The citations are the main factor determining the scientific impact of a journal, as expressed by the journal impact factor [2]. This indicator represents the mean number of citations received in an index calendar year, by all the citable articles published in a journal during the previous two years [3,4]. Several studies have been conducted to explore the factors associated with the citation count of scientific articles. The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to examine the factors associated with the number of citations of published articles, focusing on the article length

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.