Abstract

Pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI data allows estimation of quantitative imaging biomarkers such as Ktrans (rate constant for plasma/interstitium contrast reagent (CR) transfer) and ve (extravascular and extracellular volume fraction). However, the use of quantitative DCE-MRI in clinical practice is limited with uncertainty in arterial input function (AIF) determination being one of the primary reasons. In this multicenter study to assess the effects of AIF variations on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation, DCE-MRI data acquired at one center from 11 prostate cancer patients were shared among nine centers. Individual AIF from each data set was determined by each center and submitted to the managing center. These AIFs, along with a literature population averaged AIF, and their reference-tissue-adjusted variants were used by the managing center to perform pharmacokinetic data analysis using the Tofts model (TM). All other variables, including tumor region of interest (ROI) definition and pre-contrast T1, were kept constant to evaluate parameter variations caused solely by AIF discrepancies. Considerable parameter variations were observed with the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) of Ktrans obtained with unadjusted AIFs being as high as 0.74. AIF-caused variations were larger in Ktrans than ve and both were reduced when reference-tissue-adjusted AIFs were used. These variations were largely systematic, resulting in nearly unchanged parametric map patterns. The intravasation rate constant, kep (= Ktrans/ve), was less sensitive to AIF variation than Ktrans (wCV for unadjusted AIFs: 0.45 vs. 0.74), suggesting that it might be a more robust imaging biomarker of prostate microvasculature than Ktrans.

Highlights

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCEMRI) is widely used in studies of cancer and other pathologies

  • MATERIALS AND METHODS arterial input function (AIF) Challenge Participating Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Centers The QIN centers that participated in this dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI AIF challenge project were Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) managing center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) in collaboration with General Electric Research and Development, Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (MS), University of Michigan center #1 (UM1), University of Michigan center #3 (UM3), University of Pittsburgh (UPitt), Vanderbilt University (VU), and University of Washington (UW)

  • Pharmacokinetic Parameter Variations Due to AIF Differences Figure 1A plots the AIFs extracted from the DCE-MRI data of one subject by the 9 participating QIN centers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCEMRI) is widely used in studies of cancer and other pathologies. Only qualitative estimations of contrast reagent (CR) wash-in and wash-out are generally used in interpreting prostate DCE-MRI data. Arterial Input Function Determination Variations’ Impact on Prostate DCE-MRI Pharmacokinetic Modeling proaches have been under extensive investigation for more than a decade [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate DCE timecourse data is not currently recommended for routine use under the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 guidelines [11, 12]. Improved reproducibility and standardization in pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate DCE-MRI data is needed for the translation of this quantitative data analysis method into clinical settings

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call