Abstract

Attributes derived from digital bathymetric models (DBM) are a powerful means of analyzing seabed characteristics. Those models however are inherently constrained by the method of seabed sampling. Most bathymetric models are derived by collating a number of discrete corridors of multibeam sonar data. Within each corridor the data are collected over a wide range of distances, azimuths and elevation angles and thus the quality varies significantly. That variability therefore becomes imprinted into the DBM. Subsequent users of the DBM, unfamiliar with the original acquisition geometry, may potentially misinterpret such variability as attributes of the seabed. This paper examines the impact on accuracy and resolution of the resultant derived model as a function of the imaging geometry. This can be broken down into the range, angle, azimuth, density and overlap attributes. These attributes in turn are impacted by the sonar configuration including beam widths, beam spacing, bottom detection algorithms, stabilization strategies, platform speed and stability. Superimposed over the imaging geometry are residual effects due to imperfect integration of ancillary sensors. As the platform (normally a surface vessel), is moving with characteristic motions resulting from the ocean wave spectrum, periodic residuals in the seafloor can become imprinted that may again be misinterpreted as geomorphological information.

Highlights

  • Geomorphometry is a mature field in terrestrial sciences but is less well known in the marine realm

  • As with the terrestrial terrain measurements, those parameters extracted from a digital bathymetric model (DBM) are limited by the quality of the original observations

  • This paper focuses on the achievable spatial resolution of the most widespread seafloor bathymetric survey instrument used: Integrated multibeam sonar systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Geomorphometry is a mature field in terrestrial sciences but is less well known in the marine realm. This paper focuses on the achievable spatial resolution of the most widespread seafloor bathymetric survey instrument used: Integrated multibeam sonar systems. The other papers [6,7,8,9,10] present specific applications, predominately utilizing multibeam sonar observations. Artefacts specific to the acoustic imaging geometry, can be developed in the data at the same scale as the morphologic features of interest. This paper is arranged to first introduce the multibeam sonar geometry and explain the controls on achievable resolution as a function of a wide variety of parameters. Geosciences 2018, 8, 109 provided for those system artefacts that are developed close to the limit of the achievable resolution. Specific formulas to attempt to calculate solution density are omitted as they are strongly dependent on sonar configurations and motion history which are continuously variable and rarely stored with derived gridded products

Multibeam Imaging Geometry
Component
Elevation
Bottom
Section 3.1.1.
Illustrates
Impact of Selectionatofthe
Beam Density Considerations
Beam Spacing
Impact of multisector yaw and pitch
Along-Track
Corridor Overlap Considerations
Sound Speed Residuals
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.