The Impact of a Simplified Scoring System on Long-Term Survival Outcomes in Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a worldwide public health concern. We aimed to investigate the association between preoperative prognostic scoring system based on the combination of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and long-term survival outcomes in patients with (GC). Data from 513 patients were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate the association between this prognostic score system and risks of all-cause mortality. This simple prognostic score system (0–3 points) was an independent predictor of long-term survival outcomes in patients with GC after radical gastrectomy based on multivariate analyses. Prognostic 1-point score, 2-point score, and 3-point score significantly increased 50% (95% CI, 14%–98%; P = 0.004), 75% (95% CI, 22%–151%; P = 0.003), and 116% (95% CI, 26%–271%; P = 0.005) hazards of 5-year all-cause mortality, respectively, compared to prognostic 0-point score. Five-year overall survival rates were significantly decreased as prognostic scores increased, (0 point, 57.3%; 1-point, 41.3%; 2-ponint, 36.6%; 3-point, 25.9%; P < 0.01; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.62). A prognostic scoring method based on combination of age, ASA-PS, and PNI may serve as an independent risk stratification metric for long-term survival in patients with GC.