Abstract

BackgroundPotentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with the incidence of adverse drug reactions, drug-related hospitalization and other negative outcomes in older adults. After hospitalization, older adults might be discharged with several types of PIPs. Studies have found that the lack of healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) knowledge regarding PIP is one of the major contributing factors in this issue. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ and clinical pharmacists’ behavior regarding potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and potential prescribing omission (PPO) among hospitalized older adults.MethodsThis is a before-and-after study that took place in a tertiary Malaysian hospital. Discharge medications of patients ≥65 years old were reviewed to identify PIMs/PPOs using version 2 of the STOPP/START criteria. The prevalence and pattern of PIM/PPO before and after the intervention were compared. The intervention targeted the physicians and clinical pharmacists and it consisted of academic detailing and a newly developed smartphone application (app).ResultsThe study involved 240 patients before (control group) and 240 patients after the intervention. The prevalence of PIM was 22% and 27% before and after the intervention, respectively (P = 0.213). The prevalence of PPO in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (42% Vs. 53.3%); P = 0.014. This difference remained statistically significant after controlling for other variables (P = 0.015). The intervention was effective in reducing the two most common PPOs; the omission of vitamin D supplements in patients with a history of falls (P = 0.001) and the omission of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with coronary artery disease (P = 0.03).ConclusionsThe smartphone app coupled with academic detailing was effective in reducing the prevalence of PPO at discharge. However, it did not significantly affect the prevalence or pattern of PIM.

Highlights

  • Older adults constitute the majority of medicine consumers as the number of diseases increases with age

  • The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of academic detailing in conjunction with a smartphone app on the hospital healthcare professionals’ (HCPs)’ behavior regarding Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older adults

  • Impact of the intervention on potentially inappropriate prescribing At discharge, the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) was lower in the intervention group (22%) than that of the control group (27%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Older adults constitute the majority of medicine consumers as the number of diseases increases with age This fact and other age-related physiological and pathological changes put older adults at higher risk to experiencing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), drug-drug interaction and drug-disease interactions compared to other age groups [1]. Beers and STOPP criteria address potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), while START criteria discuss potential prescribing omissions (PPOs). Older adults might be discharged with several types of PIPs. Studies have found that the lack of healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) knowledge regarding PIP is one of the major contributing factors in this issue. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ and clinical pharmacists’ behavior regarding potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and potential prescribing omission (PPO) among hospitalized older adults

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call