Abstract
I N THIS communication the immunologic response of allergic children to injections of antigen is compared with that of nonallergic children. The results of intracutaneous immunization to tetanus by the use of tetanus toxoid and to tetanus and diphtheria by the use of t,he combined toxoids are also here reported. The obvious advantages of an active, as contrasted with a passive, immunity, especially when the latter necessitates the use of foreign serum, are well known. These are even more marked when we consider the transient nature of passive immunity (l’igs. 1 and 2).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
