Abstract

Borys Grinchenko's creativity was evaluated differently during the 20th century. In the USSR, official science praised him, and then forbade recollection of him. The period of the 1940s is important from this perspective, since it is possible to see how Grinchenko was evaluated by emigrants at the time of the official ban. The Ukrainian artistic movement (1945–1948, MUR) was a powerful surge in the activity of artists-emigrants.By the end of the 1920s, historians of Ukrainian literature (I. Franko, S. Yefremov, O. Barvinskyi) placed Grinchenko in the context of the “Eighties” generation. There he was given the prominent place of “the first professional writer on Ukraine”. The main principle of constructing such stories was the generation theory. Therefore, the researchers observed that Grinchenko was close to the “Seventies”, but placed him in another generation.MUR was not a monolithic entity. There have always been discussions and different groups in it. However, the analysis conducted shows that the participants of the movement highly appreciated the inheritance of Grinchenko. They gave his work an important place in the educational movement. Yu. Shevelov and V. Petrov clearly denied the inability of Grinchenko’s poetry to develop in the direction of modernism.The main historical and literary principle in the 1940s is the stylistic. Therefore, the participants of the MUR consider Grinchenko not as a representative of the generation, but as the bearer of certain style dominants. According to their estimates, the achievements of European realistic prose of the 19th century embodied in Grinchenko's prose. In the journalistic statements of representatives of various groups of the MUR, he appears as a marker of the end of the pre-modern period of Ukrainian literature.The article presents the strokes for the portrait of Borys Grinchenko in Ukrainian literary criticism. Such a portrait should be written, taking into account all stages of the formation of his image during the 20th century.

Highlights

  • Творчість Бориса Грінченка по-різному оцінювалася протягом 20 століття

  • Вони відводили його творчості важливе місце в просвітницькому русі

  • Що відділяють два об’єкти цієї розвідки, — від смерті Бориса Грінченка до заснування Мистецького українського руху — українське літературознавство пережило низку радикальних змін в оцінці постаті цього письменника та його доби

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Творчість Бориса Грінченка по-різному оцінювалася протягом 20 століття. В СРСР офіційна наука то вихваляла його, то забороняла згадувати. До кінця 1920-х років історики української літератури У публіцистичних висловлюваннях представників різних груп МУРу він постає своєрідним маркером кінця домодерного періоду української літератури.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.