Abstract

The main aims of the present study were to explore the illness representations of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and investigate the relationship of these beliefs to outcome. Based on Leventhal et al.'s self-regulation model, the commonly accepted generic five-component structure of illness representations including identity, time-line, consequences, cause, and cure/controllability was used. A cross-sectional, correlational design was employed for the study. Interrelationships among the illness representation components and the relationships between the components and outcome were explored using Pearson's r. To determine the contribution of the illness representation components to the explained variance in outcome, a series of stepwise multiple regression analyses was used. A total of 99 participants took part in the study. A series of measures were completed to assess (1). illness representations and (2). five specific areas of outcome. Participants' illness representations of MS were consistent with the medical nature and understanding of this illness indicating that they held the perceptions of a strong illness identity, chronic time-line, no particular cause and no cure. Beliefs in the serious consequences of MS and limited control were also reported. Some important interrelationships among the illness representation components were demonstrated where a strong illness identity, chronic time-line view and perception of low control were related to more serious consequences. Overall, evidence was provided to suggest that illness representations contribute to outcome. The consequences component was associated with, and contributed to, the explained variance for each of the five outcome areas, indicating that the perception that MS has many negative effects on an individual's life was associated with greater levels of difficulty in all of the outcome areas. In addition, for each of the outcome variables, different combinations of illness representation components explained their variance. For example, higher levels of depression were associated with perceptions of a stronger illness identity, more serious consequences, acute time-line, and low control. Overall support is provided for the application of the five-component structure of illness representations to MS and the likely contribution of such beliefs to outcome. The concept of illness representations therefore provides a useful framework for understanding the psychosocial effects of this illness.

Highlights

  • The way in which people think about and make sense o f the illnesses they experience has become an increasingly popular area for psychological study over the last two decades

  • These conditions are: (1) the level o f measurement must be at least interval, (2) the sample data are drawn from a population that is normally distributed and (3) the variances o f both variables are not significantly different, that is, there is homogeneity of variance (Coolican, 1995)

  • The inter-relationships between the different components o f illness representations found in the present study provide some support for the findings of previous research which have included a range o f illness populations, including multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and myocardial infarction (MI)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The way in which people think about and make sense o f the illnesses they experience has become an increasingly popular area for psychological study over the last two decades. These beliefs or cognitive models are commonly referred to as illness representations and are considered to play a fundamental role in determining an individual’s response to an illness. Research concerning illness representations has considered the ways in which these beliefs determine outcomes, such as, disability, emotional well-being and social functioning. Very little is known about the illness representations held by individuals with MS and how these beliefs may direct their responses to this condition

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.