Abstract

Extensive morphological variability in Nemognatinae has often led to proliferation of species descriptions. Most species of Nemognathinae are seldom encountered in nature and some species remain only known by the specimens used for the original descriptions. Two examples of this problem are represented by Sitaris lativentris Schaufuss, 1861 and Sitaris melanurus Kuster, 1849, both described from Spain. The rediscovery of specimens morphologically assignable to S. lativentris in southern Spain, and a careful reading of the original description of S. melanurus , allow us to shed light on the taxonomic status of these enigmatic taxa. Sitaris lativentris has been considered a synonym of Sitaris solieri Pecchioli, 1840 until now; however, neither the lectotype of S. lativentris (here designated), nor the newly found specimens morphologically assignable to S. lativentris , correspond to S. solieri , except in coloration. Alternatively, comparisons between S. lativentris and S. muralis did not render any differences, except in the pattern of elytral coloration and coloration of the pilosity, both variable in other species of Nemognathinae. Therefore S. lativentris is hereby synonymised with S. muralis (new synonymy). The identity of Sitaris melanurus has been overlooked by most researchers, probably because the type specimens seem to be lost. However, the original description provides sufficient information to discard the inclusion of the taxon in Sitaris . Morphological characters presented in the description correspond to traits that, among western European sitarine beetles, are only present in Stenoria apicalis (Latreille, 1804). Kuster’s (1849) description corresponds to one of the most frequent color variants of this species. As a consequence we include the name S. melanurus as a new synonym of S. apicalis .

Highlights

  • Several species of Meloidae parasitoids on solitary bees, show during the adult phase various levels of morphological modifications with respect to the typical “meloid bauplan”, which is recognizable in the speciose tribes Mylabrini and Lyttini (Bologna, 1991)

  • These modifications are obvious in some genera of Nemognathinae, namely in the sitarine lineage of the tribe Nemognathini (Bologna, 1991; Bologna & Pinto, 2002; Bologna et al, 2008)

  • In this tribe elytral reduction and general body shape modification are common (e.g. Allendesalazaria Martínez de la Escalera, 1910, Apalus Fabricius, 1775, Glasunovia Semenov, 1895, Hornia Riley, 1877, Nyadatus Aksentjev, 1981, Sitaris Latreille, 1802, Sitarobrachys Reitter, 1883, Sitaromorpha Dokhtouroff, 1890, and Stenoria Mulsant, 1857) (Pinto & Bologna, 1999; Bologna & Pinto, 2002). Some species in those gene-ra show a surprisingly high intraspecific variability in external morphological traits (MacSwain, 1956, 1958; Pardo Alcaide, 1958; Bologna, 1991), which otherwise are generally constant in Meloidae, including head, prothorax and elytral shape, antennae and leg width and length, and coloration of body parts and vestiture (Pardo Alcaide, 1958; Kaszab, 1963; Bologna, 1991). This variability has often led to taxonomic confusion and in many cases proliferation of species descriptions often representing the morphological diversity within single species [see for example the synonym list of Sitarobrachys thoracicus (Kraatz, 1862) (Bologna, 1994, 2008)]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several species of Meloidae parasitoids on solitary bees, show during the adult phase various levels of morphological modifications with respect to the typical “meloid bauplan”, which is recognizable in the speciose tribes Mylabrini and Lyttini (Bologna, 1991). Sitaris melanurus was described (as Sitaris melanura) from southern France and Spain (Type locality: “Südfrankreich und Spanien”) (Küster, 1849a) The identity of this enigmatic taxon escaped the attention of most researchers on the group, which retained the name as a valid taxon from catalogue to catalogue without discussion (Beauregard, 1890; Rodríguez López-Neyra, 1914; Borchmann, 1917; Mader, 1927; Bologna, 2008), or with vague statements about its taxonomic value (Escherich, 1897: 132; Pardo Alcaide, 1958: 21; García-París et al, 2010: 193). Ctenopus sturmii Küster, 1849b: no 72 Stenoria apicalis (Latreille, 1804): Mulsant, 1857: 186 Stenoria kraatzii Mulsant et Rey, 1861: 191 Hapalus (Stenoria) apicalis (Latreille, 1804): Procházka, 1892: Apalus (Stenoria) apicalis picicollis Escherich, 1897: 123 Stenoria brunneicollis Pic, 1914: 74 (this synonymy requires further study) Apalus melanurus (Küster, 1849): Borchmann, 1917: 144 Stenoria apicalis ab. basicollis Kaszab, 1956: 158 (name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. vitticollis Kaszab, 1956: 158 (name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. bipunctata Kaszab, 1956: (name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. communimacula Kaszab, 1956: (name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. nigroplagiata Kaszab, 1956: (name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. tristicula Kaszab, 1956: (name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. paucinigra Pardo Alcaide, 1958: name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. kaszabiana Pardo Alcaide, 1958: name not available) Stenoria apicalis ab. catalonica Pardo Alcaide, 1958: (name not available Stenoria apicalis ab. luteifrons Pardo Alcaide, 1958: (name not available) Stenoria apicalis var. iranica Kaszab, 1959: 440 (this synonymy requires further study)

Sitaris muralis
Sitaris solieri
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call