Abstract
Background and AimsTo identify and validate N-glycan biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC) and to elucidate their underlying molecular mechanism of action.MethodsIn total, 347 individuals, including patients with GC (gastric cancer) or atrophic gastritis and healthy controls, were randomly divided into a training group (n=287) and a retrospective validation group (n=60). Serum N-glycan profiling was achieved with DNA sequencer-assisted/fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (DSA-FACE). Two diagnostic models were constructed based on the N-glycan profiles using logistic stepwise regression. The diagnostic performance of each model was assessed in retrospective, prospective (n=60), and follow-up (n=40) cohorts. Lectin blotting was performed to determine total core-fucosylation, and the expression of genes involved in core-fucosylation in GC was analyzed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.ResultsWe identified at least 9 N-glycan structures (peaks) and the levels of core fucose residues and fucosyltransferase were significantly decreased in GC. Two diagnostic models, designated GCglycoA and GCglycoB, were constructed to differentiate GC from control and atrophic gastritis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) for both GCglycoA and GCglycoB were higher than those for CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and CA72-4. Compared with CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and CA72-4, the sensitivity of GCglycoA increased 29.66%, 37.28%, 56.78% and 61.86%, respectively, and the accuracy increased 10.62%, 16.82%, 25.67% and 28.76%, respectively. For GCglycoB, the sensitivity increased 27.97%, 35.59%, 55.09% and 60.17% and the accuracy increased 21.26%, 24.64%, 31.40% and 34.30% compared with CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and CA72-4, respectively. After curative surgery, the core fucosylated peak (peak 3) and the total core fucosylated N-glycans (sumfuc) were reversed.ConclusionsThe results indicated that the diagnostic models based on N-glycan markers are valuable and noninvasive alternatives for identifying GC. We concluded that decreased core-fucosylation in both tissue and serum from GC patients may result from the decreased expression of fucosyltransferase.
Highlights
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most prevalent cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death, with an incidence of approximately 930,000; annually, it is responsible for over 700,000 deaths worldwide, and the five-year survival rate is 20-30% [1]
Several molecules have been recommended as gastric cancer (GC) biomarkers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for postoperative surveillance, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) [2,3,4,5,6]
GCglycoA had a sensitivity of 75.42%, which is an increase in sensitivity of 29.66%, 37.28%, 56.78% and 61.86% compared with CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and CA72-4, respectively
Summary
Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most prevalent cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death, with an incidence of approximately 930,000; annually, it is responsible for over 700,000 deaths worldwide, and the five-year survival rate is 20-30% [1]. Several molecules have been recommended as GC biomarkers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for postoperative surveillance, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) [2,3,4,5,6]. None of these tumor markers has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity or specificity for diagnosing GC at an early stage. Conclusions: The results indicated that the diagnostic models based on N-glycan markers are valuable and noninvasive alternatives for identifying GC. We concluded that decreased core-fucosylation in both tissue and serum from GC patients may result from the decreased expression of fucosyltransferase
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.