Abstract

India has many religious groups, of which Hindus are a majority, and Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Jains are minorities. India’s Constitution, adopted in 1950, departed from the existing norms of secularism in Europe and elsewhere, which suggested a strict separation of religion and state. Moreover, freedom of religion is a Fundamental Right guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. With its distinct model of secularism and special provisions for religious minorities, India’s social cohesion arrangement needs special attention. On one hand, the distinct understanding of secularism in the Indian context has led to the advancement of religious pluralism. At the same time, it has invited criticism for selective intervention in the affairs of religious communities from governments in power. The selective intervention has challenged the exclusivity of Indian secularism. This article evaluates the constitutional and theoretical ideas underlying provisions on religious minorities and freedom of religion enshrined in the Indian Constitution. It appraises the idea of religious minorities enshrined in the constitution through a discussion of the process that shaped the idea. The article reflects on the Indian experience of managing the rights of religious minorities and freedom of religion. By analysing a landmark judgement related to freedom of religion and the rights of religious minorities, the article evaluates whether the Indian Constitution advances a model of social cohesion by balancing freedom of religion and the rights of religious minorities or remains ineffective in achieving the same.

Highlights

  • The Indian experience in constitution-making coincided with the trajectory of the nationalist struggle for independence from colonial rule

  • By analysing a landmark judgement related to freedom of religion and the rights of religious minorities, the article evaluates whether the Indian Constitution advances a model of social cohesion by balancing freedom of religion and the rights of religious minorities or remains ineffective in achieving the same

  • The Assembly had to ensure that the post-independence philosophy of India as a nation concerning the treatment of religious minorities was coherent

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Indian experience in constitution-making coincided with the trajectory of the nationalist struggle for independence from colonial rule. The Indian National Congress (hereafter ‘Congress party’) was leading and managing the process of nationalist struggle for an independent India and its probable constitution.. The paper will evaluate the challenges facing the national movement and constitution-making vis-à-vis the Congress party’s response to the idea of religious minorities. The Assembly had to ensure that the post-independence philosophy of India as a nation concerning the treatment of religious minorities was coherent. Though Nehru rightly assumed that the principle of secularism was inevitable in the making of a modern and independent India, he led the Assembly to believe that, in this process, accommodating various identities would be an asset In his efforts and ideas to manage the concerns of minorities, Nehru extended the premises of accommodation. An unrealistic definition of national unity and integrity resulted in unwarranted fear that it was in danger’ (Austin 2001, p. 19)

The Constitutionalization of the Idea of Minorities
Reflecting on the Indian Experience
Shah Bano and the Idea of Minorities
Analysing India’s Model of Social Cohesion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call