Abstract

Every attempt to conceive the real as restricted within finite limits either explicitly or by implication denies itself and impels our thought beyond all limits to the postulation of an infinite being, on which all else depends and in which everything lives, moves and has its being. There must be, as Spinoza insisted, an infinite whole—call it what you will—in which alone anything can be, and through which alone anything can be conceived. It is in this inescapable fact that all the traditional proofs of God’s existence are rooted. They maintain in effect, first, that the fact is inescapable (the Ontological Proof) ; secondly, that the finite nature of the world as we experience it, and of ourselves, as we know ourselves, makes the fact inescapable (the Cosmological Proof) and, finally, that whatever is intelligible is so only by virtue of its supplementation and amplification into that infinite whole, of which its intelligible structure is evidence (the Tele-ological Proof). It is one ultimate fact, and only one, that all three forms taken by the traditional proofs of the existence of God explicate and demonstrate.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.