Abstract

This paper is devoted to the study of autistic speech from the perspective of iconicity. Language is a major means of human I-not-I interaction and communication. When there is affinity between content and the form designating it, this form (linguistic units and their organization) is said to be iconic to that content. Looking at the various modes of linguistic iconicity (from the phonetic level to the entire discourse, and from identity and continuity to modes of resemblance and analogy), milestone autistic denominators are detailed and analyzed as they occur in an authentic diary written over three years by a woman with autism. This article offers a look at echolalia; pronoun management; perception of affinity as exemplified in the use of kinship terms; content words vs. grammar markers, neologisms and other phenomena. These findings are then integrated to show that mutism is the most authentic – and iconic – mode enacting the traumatic autistic rupture of the delusory symbiotic state. In this premature frail encapsulation the counter-iconic use of language is in itself a pseudo use. By treating both language (phones, words, idioms, discourse, etc.) and people as things, the verbal oddities of autistic speakers authentically iconize the inauthentic inanimate stance.

Highlights

  • Iconicity is a quality of affinity between content and the form designating it

  • Semiotics, following Charles Peirce (1965) classifies signs into three cardinal categories: firstness: identity; secondness: resemblance and thirdness: analogy mediated by convention

  • We investigate the semiotic relations holding between the autistic states and the selected typical linguistic behaviors emerging in autistic speech: our first sub-section focuses on echolalia; we focus on similarity and conclude looking at analogy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Iconicity is a quality of affinity between content and the form designating it. Semiotics, following Charles Peirce (1965) classifies signs into three cardinal categories: firstness: identity (pure icon); secondness: resemblance (index) and thirdness: analogy mediated by convention (symbol). 9), the term ‘autism’ covers “a specific spectrum of disorders in which there is an absence of human relationships and gross impoverishment of mental and emotional life”. These impairments, she argues, result from “the blocking of awareness by an early aberrant development of autistic procedures”. Considering the various modes of linguistic iconicity (from the phonetic level to the entire discourse, and from identity to different modes of resemblance and analogy: secondness and thirdness) the emergence of autistic etiology in autistic speech is outlined. Pragmatics viewed,
 following
 Kasher
 and
 Meilijson,
 “as
 the
 linguistic
 conditions
 of
 appropriate use
 of
 sentences
 in
 context”,
 these
 oddities
 seen
 from
 the
 autistic
 ruptured
 context turn
out
to
be
not
only
the
most
appropriate
but
iconically
imaging
that
state

Methodology
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.