Abstract

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recently proposed a new grading system for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We aimed to validate the prognostic performance of the grading system and explore its role in guiding the strategy of lymph node (LN) dissection. We retrospectively reviewed 1029 patients with clinical stage I LUAD who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2013. The association between mediastinal nodal metastasis and grading system was evaluated. To investigate the value of the grading system in guiding LN dissection strategies, 3 pathologists evaluated the feasibility of identifying the grading system using frozen section (FS). The differences in prognosis between all neighboring grades were highly significant based on the grading system ( P <0.001). Notably, almost no grade 1 LUAD (1.4%) had pN2 disease, whereas higher rates were found in grade 2 LUAD (9.6%) and grade 3 LUAD (18.3%) ( P <0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that higher tumor grade was an independent predictor of mediastinal nodal metastasis ( P =0.002). Moreover, limited mediastinal LN dissection had equivalent prognosis in grade 1 LUAD, but significantly worse prognosis in grade 2 and grade 3 LUAD than systematic mediastinal LN dissection. The overall accuracy of using intraoperative FS to identify the IASLC grading system was 85.4% (κ=0.765) with substantial agreement. The IASLC grading system could accurately stratify prognosis and predict mediastinal nodal metastasis in patients with clinical stage I LUAD. FS was feasible for identifying the IASLC grading system.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.