Abstract
ABSTRACT How did property in persons manifest itself in late eighteenth-century Bombay? This article uses judicial records to explore how the master-slave relationship could be inverted: a woman sued a man who claimed to ‘own’ her for the money she spent on maintaining him. These records provide a unique insight into the biography and everyday life of an urban slave in this period and the intertwining of domesticity, caste, religion and kin-building. Jaffer Mahomed claimed that Assa was a slave and collateral on a debt and produced a deed of sale and a mortgage bond. Assa claimed she had maintained him and produced an itemized account of everyday expenditure and a manumission document. Through an analysis of the documents produced in court, interrogations, complaints and rejoinders, this article demonstrates how judicial sources can help understand the strategic choices and horizon of possibilities available to urban slaves in this period.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.