Abstract
AbstractThe comment takes up the discussion by Ivana Jelić and Linus Mührel on the merits and deficits of the UN Human Rights Committee and the options for its reform. It advocates a view that takes contradictions between different perspectives on human rights into account, be they rooted in legal culture or in societal forces. It addresses discourse as the source of legitimacy and normativity of human rights, and therefore agrees with proposals to strengthen the treaty bodies within the framework of existing treaties, but also recalls the conditions of legal and societal discourse on the domestic plane.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
