Abstract

It was 45 years ago that in a virtual revolution in thinking in immunology there developed the acceptance and the subsequent expansion of two new dogmas: (1) that to eliminate toxins and pathogens as the major mode of defense, individual immune cells were, in their ontogeny of differentiation, internally programmed to react singly and then clonally against the virtually limitless individual stimuli of the outside world (1–3); (2) that before this programming was manifested the immune system would fail to recognize any antigenic stimulus as foreign, thereby not differentiating non-self from self-recognition. This allowed for non-self-antigens, if introduced in this early stage, to be immunologically tolerated on subsequent testing. In the chronology of the evolution of these two dogmas, there were the earlier descriptions of specific immunological paralysis and unresponsiveness to certain defined polysaccharides and haptens demonstrated in adult mice and guinea pigs respectively by Felton (4) and Chase (5). It remained for Medawar and his colleagues (6) in allotransplantation experiments to clearly define “acquired specific immunological tolerance” as an ontogenic concept involving the lack of maturation or differentiation were tolerance to be evoked. As early as 1953, Billingham, Brent, and Medawar demonstrated that allogeneic donor bone marrow-derived cells could confer such a specifically acquired tolerant state to the immune system of the murine recipient before self versus non-self recognition occurred in immune ontogeny, the test being subsequent acceptance of skin allografts from the same donors. The developmental processes of positive versus negative selection only a decade later began to be demonstrated to predominantly involve the thymus gland in maturational events of cells of the recipient immune system in studies first performed in neonatal rodents (7). By experimental manipulation of the immune system predominantly involving immunoablation by whole body x-irradiation, these findings of specific immunological tolerance as a result of the infusion of bone marrow-derived cells could be extended to adult animals as the system regenerated from stem cells in the bone marrow of either that of the donor (8), the recipient (9), or both (10). Nonetheless, except in the setting of clinical bone marrow transplantation using major (lethal) immunoablation followed by the salvage and replacement of the recipient immunohematopoietic system with donor cell lineages and only in the context of little or no donor-recipient MHC disparity, with few exceptions (11–15), to date, specific immunological tolerance in organ transplantation in humans has not been possible.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call