Abstract
ABSTRACT In order to investigate the potential Hubble tension, we compile a catalogue of 216 measurements of the Hubble–Lemaître constant H0 between 2012 and 2022, which includes 109 model-independent measurements and 107 ΛCDM model-based measurements. Statistical analyses of these measurements show that the deviations of the results with respect to the average H0 are far larger than expected from their error bars if they follow a Gaussian distribution. We find that xσ deviation is indeed equivalent in a Gaussian distribution to xeqσ deviation in the frequency of values, where xeq = 0.72x0.88. Hence, a tension of 5σ, estimated between the Cepheid-calibrated type Ia supernovae and cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, is indeed a 3σ tension in equivalent terms of a Gaussian distribution of frequencies. However, this recalibration should be independent of the data whose tension we want to test. If we adopt the previous analysis of data of 1976–2019, the equivalent tension is reduced to 2.25σ. Covariance terms due to correlations of measurements do not significantly change the results. None the less, the separation of the data into two blocks with H0 < 71 and H0 ≥ 71 km s−1 Mpc−1 finds compatibility with a Gaussian distribution for each of them without removing any outlier. These statistical results indicate that the underestimation of error bars for H0 remain prevalent over the past decade, dominated by systematic errors in the methodologies of CMB and local distance ladder analyses.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.